I noticed that the new book I’m reading (Special Topics in Calamity Physics, by Marisha Pessl) has a very sexy author photo on the back of it. And then I remembered that the last book I read, Flower Children, had a similarly sexy author picture. In both pictures, their heads are tilted coyly to the side and their eyes scream, come into my author photo and rip my clothes off! (see right for Pessl’s book jacket shot). Neither of these books are about particularly sexy subject matter.
I looked at a few other author pictures off of the backs of young women’s novels that were lying around my apartment. One after another, I came upon more and more of these pictures — all come-hither glances and bedroom eyes, like those mall glamour shots.
Then I looked up actual pictures of these people on the internet and they looked like normal, kind of nerdy, likeable women writers. You know, with personalities besides wanting to make it with whoever is reading their book. Even more importantly, they look comfortable (see left for Pessl’s normal picture).
Now, I know a lot of this stuff is out of their hands and has to do with their publishers selling books (I remember my professor, Brady Udall, telling us that before his first novel, The Miracle Life of Edgar Mint, was bought, the publishing company flew him out to New York to get a look at him for marketing reasons). But that doesn’t mean that we, as a freakin’ gender, can’t start recognizing that this is happening. Don’t even get me started on Halloween and the complete lack of non-sexy costumes for women. Do I want to be a sexy devil or a sexy ghost? A sexy fox or a sexy bunny?
Since I’ve started my blog, for example, I’ve gotten a few negative emails. It’s normal. But each of the emails have immediately devolved into pointing out that the picture on my blog is goofy. Not attractive. Even my own mother has suggested that I put up something prettier. I don’t know though – I want my picture to reflect what I feel and what I write about, and I guess that would be kind of awkward and a little self-conscious. And yes, goofy. Would my posts come across differently if I posted a come-hither photo of me? (Yeah, this picture is ridiculous. Yes, I got rid of that coat. No, I have not yet written a published novel. Please don’t write me an angry email.)
Now, I’m not saying that sex or being sexy is bad – for men or women. And we should embrace it or reclaim it or whatever we feel like doing with it. And if you already bought your sexy firewoman costume for the end of the month, that’s fine, too. Let’s just hold back on being sexy every once and a while, just when we need a little break – like when we want to have fun or goof around or, perhaps, when we want people to read our book for the words inside.





22 comments
Comments feed for this article
October 5, 2007 at 1:35 am
kate Herold
I remember reading a study that looked at the album covers for CDs by male and female musicians, and albums by women/female groups featured face and close-up body shots something like ten times more often than albums by men or male groups. First let me see if I think you’re hot, then I’ll decide whether I should care about your book/blog/album/art/thoughts/soul.
Also, I’m going as a sexy burrito.
October 5, 2007 at 2:10 am
Rachel
I like your winter jacket snow photo. Your regular photo is kind of scary.
October 5, 2007 at 4:04 am
Katia
you’re right, it really is about balancing sexy with goofy. but if you had a super sexy picture as your profile i would think you take yourself very seriously, so i really appreciate the goofyness. i think it captures the mood of your blog very well!
October 5, 2007 at 1:39 pm
Anne
Saw Marisha Pessl read and her reading outfit was also very sexy…It is a little disturbing to see an award winning author tottering around on 5 inch heels.
October 5, 2007 at 2:09 pm
Barbara
The title of this entry is what caught my eye while perusing WordPress.org
My first thought was yeah lets stop being sexy for even longer – say 15 minutes or so. “Sexy” – sells. I’m not against that concept because I realize some people need that concept to validate themselves. (and/or feed their greed habit) but its incredibly boring to me simply because its fake.
I get your blog photo & I like it too.
p.s. I’m going to wear my dog mask – the one with the floppy ears. Possibly w/black sweats or I just may do orange this year.
October 5, 2007 at 2:47 pm
drmiketemp
Actually I agree that the winter coat one just looks better. The current one in your sidebar just looks strange.
But to get to the point of your post, it makes me wonder if the editors in charge of those books or whomever is making the choice of the layout of the book are male.
October 5, 2007 at 3:31 pm
jonolan
I like the one you’re using; it has a bit of cleavage LOL! just kidding!
October 5, 2007 at 4:40 pm
seaswell
jonolan – i think that may be the only moment in time – and certainly the only recorded moment in time – that i have ever had cleavage. maybe that’s why i like the picture.
drmiketemp, rachel – i know, i know… but i think i kind of look like a winter alien. maybe i’ll switch things up a bit, though.
kate – good point that this crosses genres. and a sexy burrito sounds delicious.
anne – what did you think of the reading?
October 5, 2007 at 5:03 pm
Anne
I was actually a little disappointed. I loved the book when I read it, and it was kind of a let down to hear her read it. She came off as pretty vacuous, and she had no Q&A, which bugged me even more. I thought about spreading rumors of a ghostwriter
October 5, 2007 at 10:50 pm
mo79uk
A lot of the male author photos in books seem to suggest one of 3 things.
1) I am highly intelligent, much more than you.
2) I am your only best friend.
3) I can be as sexy as a female author.
October 5, 2007 at 11:22 pm
Beth from Avenue Z
I’ve often dreamed about my book jacket photo (tucked inside the back flap of the book I’ve yet to write). I’m smiling, but not too much. I’ve got on something simple — maybe a nice light sweater — something pink perhaps. And I’m staring at the camera, trying to look intelligent, sophisticated, and Damn Good.
I’m well aware of the fact that sexy sells, but I’m also cognizant of the fantasy that smart is sexy to the right audience, and savvy is sexy, and success is sexy. And I want to look Damn Good. And looking good can be sexy.
With the exception of Marisha’s photo above, I think the women look self-aware and attractive. But I don’t think they were necessarily trying to bring sexy back. I think they were trying to connect with people and trying to look strong and beautiful (their book, hopefully read by millions, should have the best picture they’ve ever taken, right?).
So if the day comes that my photo is on a book cover, I wouldn’t be unhappy with a remark like “Why does she have that sexy look?” In fact, I really hope I’m featured in a blog post with the heading, “Can we stop being sexy just for five minutes.”
I’ll shoot you an email when the book’s at the printer, so you can get ready. [author's note: book will probably never exist]
Great discussion, by the way.
October 6, 2007 at 10:51 am
Amanda
I think your current photo is pretty awesome. Don’t give in to the haterz!
October 6, 2007 at 2:06 pm
molly b.
I think it’s absolutely imperative that we women be as sexy as possible for Halloween, even if sexy is thematically inappropriate. That is why I’m weighing the following costume options for myself:
– Sexy Leper
– Sexy Child Molester
– Sexy AIDS victim
– Sexy Fetus
Happy Halloween!
October 8, 2007 at 3:21 am
Gabe
Historians, apparently, aren’t permitted to have their pictures on the backs of their books under the general theory that they are visually unpleasant, so many of these issues are moot for me.
That said, Marisha Pessl is responsible for the most insipid NYT oped of all time, so I have opted not to read her book, sexy though she may be.
Also (inspired by Molly): Last night I saw a gang of Brown undergrads heading to a “Cowboys and Indians” party dressed for the occasion. I thought about crashing the party wearing the costume of “smallpox infected blankets,” but then thought better of it.
October 8, 2007 at 2:06 pm
drmiketemp
Amanda, I personally think the term “haterz” is a tad strong.
October 8, 2007 at 5:49 pm
Lindsey
It never occurred to me to think anything negative about the picture you’re using now. I like it. I just realized, though, that if I were a stranger looking at it, I might think it was a photo of someone crying, so maybe that’s not so great.
October 10, 2007 at 4:48 pm
Ben
I just gotta say that since I’ve started reading your blog I’ve developed somewhat of an intellectual crush on you. Most of this crush has to do with really liking your writing, but I think your profile picture is really attractive. Much more attractive than your psuedo-glam-shot. While I may be an abberation, I am a straight male so this should count for something.
October 10, 2007 at 5:25 pm
jonolan
Ben, it’s the cleavage! LOL!
October 10, 2007 at 7:36 pm
MichelleD
I have a deliberately silly picture as my “avatar” because I am frequently silly, not conventionally good-looking, and don’t want to play the “Sexy Internet Hottie Princess” role. My life isn’t about being pretty and having people look at me. Why should I try to make my blog that way? Generally when I post any other photos of myself online, it’s when I’ve given myself a particularly shocking haircut or am wearing an amusing costume. I just can’t stretch to trying to be a MySpace Vixen.
Also, I think your blog picture is cute. Sneeze or gigglefit?
October 10, 2007 at 9:12 pm
poetloverrebelspy
Neither. That’s obviously a “Meh” or a “Hey!” I can hear the nasal whine all the way across the ocean.
As much as jonolan jokes, I have to totally agree that it’s a full-on cleavage shot. Sarah, could you please just stop being sexy for 5 minutes? Pot calling the kettle black much?
For those last-minute costume designers not sure how to go as sexy fetus, let me suggest some more concrete yet overlooked sexy occupations:
+ sexy undertaker
+ sexy janitor
+ sexy lunch lady
+ sexy train conductor
+ sexy anthropologist
+ sexy microbiologist
+ sexy plumber
Sexy is as sexy does!
October 11, 2007 at 2:13 pm
Catrin
I just finished Matisha Pessl`s book and i am very glad, that in Gemany it is not usal at all to print the writers picture on the back or anywhere else inside a book. because i really liked it a lot, and i am allways jealous of writers and their talents. ( like Paul Auster and his wife! I mean isn´t it enough that you are a great poet and story teller ,does your wife has to be one ,too?!) anyways if Marisha Pessl would have looked at me from the back of my book with that face, it would have been totally too much ,i would have been bothered, like i am bothered now, after looking her up in the internet.
When i still lived in the states i came across avery sexy last minute costume :cut a hole in a white plastic bag , pull it over your head and write “white trash” on it. i don´t know if that is politcal correct or not ,though…
October 19, 2007 at 4:38 pm
For Halloween, I’m going as a serial killer who targets sexy-costume wearers « BROOD
[...] it’s been unsettling since I made a post about sexy author photos in which I briefly decried the glut of sexy Halloween costumes for women over the last few years. [...]